文章摘要
郭俊萍,邓 磊,张玉露,李亚萌,肖忠明.等温传导量热法与溶解热法、直接法测定水泥水化热结果相关性分析[J].水泥工程,2025,38(1):67-71
等温传导量热法与溶解热法、直接法测定水泥水化热结果相关性分析
Correlation analysis of results of determination of cement hydration heat by isothermal conduction calorimetry, dissolution heat method, and direct method
  
DOI:
中文关键词: 等温传导量热法  溶解热法  直接法  水化热
英文关键词: Isothermal Conduction Calorimetry Method  Solution Method  Semi-adiabatic Method  heat of hydration
基金项目:
作者单位
郭俊萍 中国建筑材料科学研究总院有限公司 
邓 磊 四川峨胜水泥集团股份有限公司 
张玉露 广东至道先进土木工程材料技术研究有限公司 
李亚萌  
肖忠明  
摘要点击次数: 10
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      采用等温传导量热法、溶解热法和直接法分别测定了不同品种水泥的水化热,并就测试结果进行了对照分析。结果表明,针对不同品种水泥,等温传导量热法与溶解热法测得水泥水化热结果呈现良好的线性关系,与直接法线性关系不佳。就水化放热总量而言,等温传导量热法较其他两种方法测定的结果偏低,并且这一差值随水化龄期的不同而不同。
英文摘要:
      The heats of hydration of severlkinds of cement have been determined at different test ages in isothermal conduction calorimetry method,solution method and semi-adiabatic method,andtest results have been analyzed accordingly.It showsthatthe heatsof hydrationin isothermal conduction calorimetry methodcan be acted as a good linear functionthose in solution methodwith different kinds of cement.On theother hand,the testresultsare presented aspoor linearfunctionbetween in isothermal conduction calorimetry methodand semi-adiabatic method.In terms of total heatsof hydration,that measuredbyisothermal conduction calorimetryis lower than bytheothertwoways. In addtion,the difference varies along with hydration ages.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭