| 唐金泉.水泥窑尾旁路放风余热发电两种技术比较☆[J].水泥工程,2014,27(2):54-56 |
| 水泥窑尾旁路放风余热发电两种技术比较☆ |
| Two kiln end by-pass waste heat power generation technologies and the comparsion |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: |
| 英文关键词: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1208 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 旁路放风利于窑的稳定生产和熟料质量的提高，但会带来熟料热耗和料耗增加及环境污染等众多问题，而对旁路放风进行余热发电回收热量，则可有效降低其危害。简要介绍了旁路放风余热发电的二种技术方案——单独设置旁路放风PH余热锅炉和旁路放风与窑尾废气共用SP余热锅炉；并详细进行了这二种技术方案的分析与对比，包括共同目标与共性问题，技术不同点，配置后的操作调整，以及适用范围和经济性。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| By-pass system is benefit for kiln's stable production and clinker quality, but will bring many problems as heat and material consumption increasing and environmental pollution, and recovery of by-pass heat in waste heat power generation system can reduce the harm effectively. Two technical schemes of by-pass waste heat power generation——a separate set of by-pass PH waste heat boiler and a SP waste heat boiler shared by-pass air and kiln end waste gas, were intorduced in brief. A detail analysis and comparsion of the two schemes were given including common goals and problems, technical difference, operation adjustment and the adapting scope and economy. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|